Economic Impact of SmokeFree Ohio on Border Counties
|
|
| Posted On: 8/17/2011 |
| Summary of economic impact of Ohio's SmokeFree legislation on border counties in Ohio and Kentucky. |
ABSTRACT Objective To determine if the Ohio statewide smoke-freelaw is associatedwitheconomic activity inOhioor Kentucky counties that lie on the border between the two states. In November 2006, Ohio implemented a comprehensive statewide smoke-free law for all indoor workplaces. Design A feasible generalised least squares (FLGS) timeseries design to estimate the impact of the Ohio smokefree law on Kentucky and Ohio border counties. Setting Six Kentucky and six Ohio counties that lie on theborder between the two states. Subjects All reporting hospitality and accommodationestablishments in all Kentucky and Ohio counties including but not limited to food and drinking establishments, hotels and casinos. Main outcome measures Total number of employees,total wages paid and number of reported establishments in all hospitality and accommodation services, 6 years before Ohio’s law and 1 year after. Results There is no evidence of a disproportionatechange in economic activity in Ohio or Kentucky border counties relative to their non-border counterparts. There was no evidence of a relation between Ohio’s smoke-free law and economic activity in Kentucky border counties. The law generated a positive influence on wages and number of establishments in Ohio border counties. The null result cannot be explained by low test power, as minimum changes necessary in the dependent variables to detect a significant influence are very reasonable in size. Conclusions Our data add to the large body of evidencethat smoke-free laws are neutral with respect to the hospitality business across jurisdictions with and without laws. |